Outcome NR3
There are more trees in the landscape, consisting of well-managed native woodland, wood pasture and low-density scrub, in the right places.
Human activity over the last twelve thousand years has responded to the natural history of the North Pennines to create the landscape we all enjoy today. Woodland is no exception. At first, woodland clearings were made by hunter gatherers to attract large game such as deer. With the adoption of agriculture, woodland was progressively cleared and by the time of the Roman occupation in the early centuries AD woodland was only a minor component of the North Pennines landscape. After the collapse of the Roman Empire there was a period of woodland regeneration and medieval communities of the North Pennines benefitted from an extensive fringe of scrubby wood pasture around many of the North Pennine Fells. This provided habitat for red deer and black grouse and much of it was included in areas designated as hunting forest for the benefit of the local lords such as the Bishop of Durham. By the time of the Black Death in the mid-14th century most of the wood pasture was cleared or grazed out and is now represented by small areas of gill woodland and juniper scrub. The North Pennines is now amongst the least wooded landscapes in England, itself among the most least wooded countries in Europe.
In the absence of grazing or browsing by livestock, deer, rabbits or voles, trees and shrubs would be ubiquitous on drier ground in the North Pennines. Establishing more trees and scrub in the landscape is, therefore, mostly a matter of managing this grazing or browsing.
Ancient woodlands are woodlands where there is evidence of continuous woodland cover since at least 1600AD. It is divided into two categories; ancient semi-natural woodland which comprises native tree and shrub species, and ancient replanted woodland, where the native woodland has been cleared and replaced by a commercial plantation crop. Ensuring that ancient semi-natural woodlands are safeguarded and managed appropriately is the highest priority because of the wide range of plants, fungi and animals that are only or mainly found within such woodland or on ancient or veteran trees.
Long-established woodland is a category of woodland comprising native woodlands that were recorded on the first edition Ordnance Survey maps in the 1840s and remain to this day. While they don’t have the longevity of ancient woodlands, their continuity of woodland cover is still significant enough to sustain ecological value missing from more recent woodland, and so they are worthy of protection for this reason. Importantly it also captures woodlands where there isn’t the documentary evidence to provide continuity of woodland cover since at least 1600, but which are likely to be ancient woodlands.
In the absence of now-extinct native predators such as lynx and wolf, deer numbers have risen in the UK to the point that they have serious negative effects on new woodland establishment, on the structure of existing woodland and on natural colonisation of trees and shrubs to form new woodland. See Box 5 Deer Management.
Within existing woodlands, browsing pressure prevents a new generation of trees from becoming established, and also reduces or eliminates the shrub layer of lower growing species including bramble and honeysuckle. This leads to an absence of many important woodland habitats, structures and species, and ultimately threatens the existence of the woodland as a whole.
Grey squirrels can also severely affect tree regeneration by killing young trees by stripping the bark from them. As with deer, control of grey squirrels requires co-ordination between land managers.
Large numbers of pheasants are reared and then released into woodlands for shooting each year. They have a range of ecological impacts including the loss of ground flora around their feeding sites due to trampling, intense predation pressure on woodland invertebrates, and soil enrichment from their droppings (which enables fast-growing species such as nettles to displace less competitive woodland plants). See Box 4 Non-native game birds.
The reference to ‘more trees in the landscape’ describes any increase in the number or cover of native tree and shrub species in appropriate locations across the full altitudinal range (through natural colonisation where possible and planting where necessary). These trees and shrub species could be in the form of closed canopy woodland, open wooded pasture, low density scrub, individual trees in fields or on field boundaries, and could be the result of natural colonisation, assisted colonisation or. A more tree-rich landscape does not imply total woodland cover; a mosaic of wooded and more open species-rich habitats can be beneficial for many species.
Establishing trees and shrubs is only the first step in developing new woodland and scrub habitats. Given how poor many woodland plants, fungi and invertebrates are at colonising new sites, the establishment of new woodland ecosystems is likely to yield quite different results depending on their distance from sources of potential flora and fungi colonists. Land adjacent to ancient and long-established woodland should be prioritised for tree establishment. Elsewhere methods for introducing native woodland fungi and ground flora should be considered.
Integrated with low density livestock grazing, wood pasture provides a valuable mix of mature trees, dead wood, scrub and grassland/heathland. It provides a wide range of conditions for wildlife to live, and can support a large number of wildlife species, including many rare invertebrates, fungi and lichens. It can also be a very valuable habitat for bats.
Scrub is now a rare but very important habitat for wildlife - providing different conditions for nesting/shelter as well as a range of food (berries, nuts, insects, seeds) for wildlife to eat. Allowing scrub to develop within other habitats provides a better mix of places for wildlife to thrive.
Trees and shrubs are long-lived species and those which establish or are planted now will live through major changes in our climate. Some species will be better adapted to the changing conditions than others and species which are currently absent from the North Pennines may become suited to the new climate. Tree diseases are increasing in frequency and impact, and this also affects species chosen for planting schemes. For example, ash is not currently available as planting stock due to the spread of ash dieback fungus (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus). When planting trees, the choice of species should not be limited to just those species which have thrived here in the recent past, but consideration given to others which can provide similar ecological function in the future, considering future climate scenarios [31,32], and which may contribute to a more resilient future landscape.
In the rush to plant trees for wildlife and climate benefits there has often been a failure to plan for, or deal with, the negative consequences of releasing many tonnes of microplastics into the environment via degrading tree guards and shelters. There are alternatives under trial, and recycling schemes for used guards, but neither of these solutions is without its own problems. Better still, there are techniques to help establish trees in the uplands without guards. However current funding criteria often mitigate against using them.
Decisions around planting, natural or assisted colonisation, and the grazing and browsing control needed to achieve more tree cover must consider existing semi-natural and species-rich habitats and key species, and other nature recovery priority outcomes. Of particular sensitivity in the North Pennines is Outcome NR2 wading birds.
Trees, scrub and woodlands play an important role in natural flood management by intercepting rainwater and slowing surface run off into watercourses and drainage systems. They also have a positive impact on air quality as their leaves can filter atmospheric pollutants such as sulphur dioxide or particulate matter, and their roots and associated fungi improve soil structure and health.
Riparian tree planting can also have a localised cooling effect on rivers, helping to reduce climate change impacts on fish and other aquatic wildlife, and trees in or around pasture play the same role in providing shade (and shelter) to livestock. Woodlands also act as important carbon stores, sequestering and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Trees on farms can have multiple benefits for livestock management, and these are described with case studies in a booklet published by the National Sheep Association and the Woodland Trust [33]. They include shelter and shade leading to reduced lamb losses, increased liveweight gains, increases in grass growth and reduced risk of mastitis; Increased infiltration into soils leading to drier ground and reduced risk from liver fluke and lameness.
Which species are supported by this outcome?
Champion species
Black grouse; Cuckoo; Oak woodland bird assemblage; Green hairstreak; Small pearl-bordered fritillary.
Other species of note
Pine martens require woodland in which to survive, however they will exist in highly fragmented landscapes. It is estimated that 20% of a landscape needs to be woodland to support a pine marten population, so sufficiently connected landscapes of trees with some woodland within the North Pennines will support its return [34].
There are some significant populations of red squirrels in the North Pennines. Native and mixed woodland supports healthy populations of red squirrels, but only where grey squirrels are carefully monitored and managed.
Roe deer are increasing rapidly in numbers across the UK and have serious negative effects on new woodland establishment (by browsing young trees), on the structure of existing woodland (by inhibiting regeneration of young trees) and on natural colonisation of trees and shrubs to form new woodland.
Data from the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) Breeding Bird Survey [30] shows that roe deer in 2022 were at 271% of their 1994 population in England. There are no counts of deer across the North Pennines, but damage to new tree planting and the suppression of the shrub layer in existing woodland is obvious.
To maintain the deer population at levels which allow woodlands to regenerate, and new planting to survive a deer control plan is needed. Collectively, land managers and ecologists will need to decide on the population levels that our landscape can tolerate, it will be necessary to monitor numbers of deer, issue licenses, monitor and control deer culling activity, market venison and manage the income in a way which supports the control effort and helps local economies.
In 2024 the North Pennines National Landscape team conducted a survey of roe deer across the Cumbria part of the North Pennines using drones and infra-red imaging to make an accurate estimate of the numbers of deer in this area, as the first stage towards a strategy for deer control.
Map 4 shows the target area for Outcome NR3 (trees and scrub). Explore Map 4 in a new window.
For context Map 4 also shows layers relating to wading birds and deep peat (over 30cm).
The tree and scrub potential zone shows the areas with the best potential to support more trees and scrub in this landscape (see Outcome 3 introductory text for what we mean by more trees and scrub).
The map is based on a model which uses steeply sloping ground adjacent to 1st to 4th order streams that occupy gills, and locates ideal wading bird habitat on shallowing sloping ground. It then calculates whether planting in these gill areas could provide a vantage point for avian predators (from 10m height trees) over this potential wading bird habitat, and excludes them from the zone.
Inside this zone there is potential for more trees and scrub where certain conditions are met. Of principle importance is that increasing tree cover should not be to the detriment of other important habitats and species (see constraints below).
Outside this zone there should be a presumption against new tree planting unless the nature recovery outcomes related to the planting are likely to outweigh any damage or opportunity cost related to other nature recovery priorities.
For example:
a. where, following extensive ecological surveys to assess constraints and opportunities, tree/scrub/wood pasture establishment can be achieved on a large scale, with a design and future management which is likely to deliver biodiversity gains which outweigh any losses for open ground species and habitats.
b. where there is existing native broadleaf woodland, wood pasture or scrub already in this zone and where small-scale additional planting or natural colonisation would provide increased connectivity between isolated fragments without significant detriment to other priority habitats or species.
Constraints & factors influencing tree and scrub planting design.
Where proposed planting sites meet the required size and density, a stage one Forestry EIA should be arranged with the Forestry Commission. Additionally, national guidance for afforestation on or near peatlands, designated sites and protected species, such as wading birds, should be followed to ensure any outcomes are compatible with wider objectives of this plan. In addition, all the following constraints must be assessed.
Peat
Much of the tree and scrub potential zone in the upper reaches of gills coincides with the map of peat soils (and therefore Outcome NR1). However, the England Peat Map [74] is based on extrapolated and interpolated data and on the steep slopes of some watercourses the map may sometimes give false positives. Tree planting would be acceptable in these places if manual peat depth measurements have been carried out which show that there is no deep peat on planting sites (subject to other constraints).
Conversely, the England Peat Map [74] may not capture all deep peat, and so outside this zone, peat depth measurements should be taken to determine the presence and depth of peat. Additionally, the threshold depth of peat for planting may also change as we learn more about the impacts or benefits of planting on more shallow peat soils.
Priority habitats
Planting design (and any grazing management) needs to take account of priority habitats, including species-rich grasslands and wetland habitats such as fen and blanket bog. Where tree planting or colonisation is deemed inappropriate, support for appropriate habitat restoration work should be sought/given.
Priority species
Design needs to take account of priority species. It is not possible to provide full design guidance here for all species. Here are four examples of the sensitivity required in developing a landscape richer in trees and scrub within the Tree/scrub potential zone.
There are many other species which may be affected by tree planting:
The in-bye-suite of wading birds - The target area for action for the in-bye suite of wading birds in Outcome NR2 overlaps significantly with the tree/scrub zone in Outcome NR3. Where this is the case, and where wading birds are breeding nearby (wading bird survey is usually required -follow national guidance), great care needs to be taken when siting or designing new tree or scrub planting or when fencing areas for natural colonisation. There should be a presumption against planting adjacent to good breeding ground for wading birds in order to keep it open.
Small-pearl bordered fritillary – in the uplands uses marsh violet as a food plant and therefore may be present in some wet riparian areas. It may benefit from a certain amount of adjacent scrubby planting which provides shelter from wind, but not to the extent that its food plant is overshaded.
Water voles – in the uplands thrive on any watercourse which holds water all year round – from reservoirs to very steep streams with permanent pools. Water voles require lush vegetation and avoid shade in the uplands. Some open ground should be maintained in suitable places along such watercourses.
Ring ouzel – are summer migrants which nest in mature heather or rocky crevices in the uplands - often in steeper sided ghylls. They need a wide variety of habitats for feeding, including grassland for invertebrates in June/July and berries from moorland until September. Scattered, berry-bearing, scrub species may be beneficial to Ring ouzel in the landscape, alongside open grassland and moorland.
Other factors may weigh in favour of trees and scrub, including:
The presence of existing woodland, scrub or trees. New planting may enhance or link high quality broadleaf woodland and increase its value as habitat. However, issues of increases in predator load or predator shadow should be considered, following national guidelines.
The presence of habitat indicating former woodland (e.g. bluebells, dog’s mercury). The new planting may help safeguard existing ground flora or at least find suitable soil in which to establish. Bracken may indicate former wooded habitat, or it may indicate other stressed and dry habitat.
The presence of priority species – e.g. red squirrel, pied flycatcher. Records of priority species which rely on woodland may add support to tree establishment proposals.
Catchments where natural flood management is a priority. Trees and scrub can slow the flow of water across a catchment by intercepting rain as it falls and by absorption through roots.
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is a native UK conifer with both ecological and commercial importance. As the only native conifer with significant timber value, and with resilience to wildfires and a capacity to withstand climate extremes, it offers a role in aligning plantation forestry with nature recovery goals for the North Pennines.
As an “ecosystem engineer,” Scots pine fosters conditions conducive to the survival of juniper. It does this through creating the right microclimate for juniper establishment (shade and shelter), stabilising soils and supporting the nutrient-rich environments favoured by juniper, and sharing mycorrhizal associations which benefits both species.
Scots pine creates habitats that improve resilience against browsing and extreme weather, fostering an ecosystem network that enhances juniper growth and the overall woodland community.
Measures for outcome NR3
Select each measure for its full detail and to view the organisations and groups with an important role in making them happen.
Ensure protection and good management of all existing ancient semi-natural woodland and wood pasture, including through the following measures: • Control invasive non-native species (INNS) such as rhododendron ponticum and Himalayan balsam, and grey squirrel where these are threatening red squirrels or significantly damaging trees. • Take measures to exclude grazing or browsing animals, including livestock, deer and rabbits, where these are impacting on natural regeneration or colonisation. • Monitor and co-ordinate the control of deer across the landscape to allow for scrub and woodland understorey development. [A structure is required to i) decide on appropriate numbers to achieve desired objectives, ii) monitor numbers, iii) issue licences, iv) monitor and control activity, v) market produce, vi) manage income].
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Register all long-established woodlands as local wildlife sites (if not already designated and they meet local site designation criteria) to identify and protect them from loss or development in local plans.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Don’t release or feed non-native game birds within 500m of sensitive locations (See Box 4 Non-native game birds for details)
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • |
Sensitively restore plantations on ancient woodland sites (PAWS) to native woodland, protecting ancient woodland features, providing diversity in age and structure of woodland, including creation of open space and retention of standing deadwood as appropriate. Forestry Commission have produced a practice guide [35].
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Manage ancient trees (and veteran trees) sensitively in and outside woodland. Woodland Trust and Natural England have published guidance for land managers [36,37].
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Expand and buffer ancient woodland sites and ancient wood pasture, either through natural or assisted colonisation, introduction of seed, or planting with native trees and shrubs, as appropriate.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Create new upland wood pasture. This can be done by excluding grazing alongside assisted natural colonisation using seed from appropriate trees and shrub species, followed by a reintroduction of (extensive) cattle grazing when scrub is established, or by planting up cages of trees and thorny shrubs in a pasture with low numbers of livestock.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Facilitate expansion of scrub such as hawthorn, willow, bird cherry, alder, birch, aspen and rowan, as well as woodland trees like oak, by creating the right germination conditions through grazing and herbivore disturbance or scarification, and either relying on natural colonisation where there is a seed source or assisting colonisation (by collecting, preparing and sowing/planting seed) if not.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Plant trees and scrub, where necessary, to meet local objectives, including:
• increased riparian planting to reduce water temperature
• extending woodland and scrub connectivity along upland gills
• diversifying heathland habitats with scrub
• silvo-pastoral systems, including trees for shade, shelter and browse
• restoring degraded habitats such as bracken dominated fellsides or grass moorland
• maximising connectivity between wooded habitats Use techniques which don't require plastic guards where possible, for example:
• using thorny shrubs • planting at very high densities
• using cuttings from nearby
• direct seeding
• and trialling of non-plastic guards where suitable.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Design and plant new woodlands to maximise value for wildlife.
New woodlands should use 100% native species, and should be designed to be managed using low impact silvicultural systems such as continuous cover forestry.
Restocking of conifer or mixed plantations should use a large proportion of native trees and shrubs (our clear preference is 100% native), and consideration must be given to the other priority outcomes in this plan (for example on peat soils (Outcome NR1), on or adjacent to suitable wading bird habitat (Outcome NR2).
At minimum, restocking should meet the UK Forestry Standard.
Native tree mixes could include mixed broadleaf and Scots pine plantations. [See Box 7 – Scots pine and juniper]
Where non-native trees are selected, they should be selected for their ecological function as well as future climate resilience.
Guidance on species selection for different sites is available from North Pennines National Landscape, Woodland Trust and Forestry Commission.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Manage woodlands to provide more wildlife-friendly habitat, for example by
• ensuring structural diversity (well-developed ground flora, shrub layer and canopy)
• ensuring tree & shrub species diversity through targeted thinning of new woodlands, or exploiting light availability from existing or manufactured gaps in older plantations., to plant appropriate numbers of suitably protected trees
• restoring hydrology in wet woodlands
• management for key woodland species
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Help woodlands and woodland flora and fauna to adapt to ash dieback. Several approaches to this are outlined in a Forestry Commission research note [31].
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Encourage suitable woodland ground flora and fungal associates to establish in new wooded areas using local provenance seeds, plants or spores.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Manage grazing across large areas of landscape in ways which provide opportunities for scrub establishment and the maintenance of an open structure of scrub and scattered trees. This grazing management is especially important where too much shade would damage underlying features such as species-rich areas of pasture, habitat for species which require more open ground, such as adder, water vole, many invertebrates.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Control grey squirrels in a humane, co-ordinated, and targeted way to help sustain red squirrel populations in the remaining strongholds in the Northumberland and Cumbrian North Pennines. Ensure predator control, where it exists, is designed to avoid accidentally trapping recolonising pine martens.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
Control deer in a humane, co-ordinated, and targeted way to aid woodland and scrub establishment and shrub storey development. (See Box 5 Deer management).
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • |
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Restore old and create new hedgerows (including hedgerow trees) where this fits with landscape character. Plant new standard trees around farm steadings and in North Pennines villages to replace others before they come to the end of their life.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Manage hedgerows to maximise wildlife benefit.
• Trim hedges in autumn or winter, outside of the nesting bird season (March – August).
• Do not trim hedges in every year to encourage fruit/seed production.
• Trim to an ‘A’ frame shape.
• Lay the hedge every 10-15 years to promote dense re-growth.
• Allow ‘gappy’ hedges to grow out before laying or, in extreme circumstances, coppicing.
• Consider marking a tree every 10m to exclude from cutting to promote standard trees (but consider Outcome NR 2)
For further guidance please contact the North Pennines National Landscape staff team.
| Farmers & land managers | Conservation bodies | National and/or local government |
| • | • | • |
Targets and monitoring for data tree and scrub cover can be found in the Measuring Progress section.
